- Posted February 22, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Ohio Woman's lawsuit claims Effexor caused fatal birth defect
BOSTON -- In what is believed to be the first lawsuit of its kind, an Ohio woman is claiming that her ingestion of the popular anti-depressant Effexor during pregnancy caused a fatal birth defect in her daughter.
"This ... drug was approved by the FDA in 1993, but the parties involved neglected to disclose the birth defect risks to physicians treating women of child-bearing age," said Philadelphia lawyer Thomas Anapol in a press release.
Anapol is one of six attorneys representing Glenn and Lauren Boyer in their product liability suit against Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and its parent, Pfizer. According to the couple's complaint, Mrs. Boyer took Effexor as prescribed by her doctor while she was pregnant with her daughter, Adelaide. The girl was born on Feb. 11, 2010, with severe heart defects, including a malformed aorta and mitral valve. Adelaide died shortly after her birth.
Product liability suits involving Effexor and similar antidepressants have generally involved claims asserting a risk of suicide. In 2010, GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of the antidepressant Paxil, settled more than 800 cases alleging a link between the drug and birth defects.
According to the Boyers' attorneys, their lawsuit is the first to allege a link between Effexor and birth defects.
The lawsuit was filed Feb. 9 in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia.
The 17-count complaint includes strict liability claims for failure to warn and design defect, as well as claims for negligence, fraud and misrepresentation.
Christopher Coffin of New Orleans, La., is another attorney who represents the Boyers. He explained the Boyers' claim that the drug makers' fraud and misrepresentation led to Adelaide's death.
"It is likely that the defendants had evidence to the contrary of what was disseminated for public information," Coffin said in the press release. "To minimize and understate the risks was to place Adelaide and her family in an experiment they would never have consented to."
Published: Wed, Feb 22, 2012
headlines Detroit
- Grand jury refuses to indict Slotkin, other Dems over military orders video
- The Trump Administration is Losing Credibility with Judges and Grand Juries — Why This is ‘Remarkable and Unprecedented’
- ABA book provides a guide to the Indian Child Welfare Act and its legal and cultural significance
- Apology ‘for the harm’ inflicts even more pain to aftermath of killings
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- A wave of lawsuits has resulted from online comments after Charlie Kirk’s assassination
- Goldman Sachs top lawyer resigns after emails show Jeffrey Epstein friendship
- Failed indictment of 6 Democratic lawmakers blamed on Jeanine Pirro-picked prosecutors
- Federal judges may address ‘illegitimate forms of criticism and attacks,’ according to new ethics opinion
- Senate GOP aims to reveal companies funding lawsuits
- Bad Bunny’s ‘love conquering hate’ message at Super Bowl reiterated by judge sentencing assaulter




