LOS ANGELES (AP) — Federal officials are implementing a new policy that guarantees legal counsel to detained immigrants who can’t represent themselves because of severe mental disorders or conditions that render them mentally incompetent.
The national policy announced by Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security officials this week comes after a yearslong legal fight led by the American Civil Liberties Union through a lawsuit filed in Los Angeles.
About 34,000 immigrants are detained daily and more than 1,000 of them have mental disabilities of some kind, according to the ACLU.
In 2010, the ACLU won a right to representation for two mentally disabled men who spent years in custody. Both were legal residents facing deportation after criminal convictions.
The lawsuit was filed by José Antonio Franco-Gonzalez, a Mexican immigrant with a cognitive disability who was detained in federal immigration facilities for nearly five years without a hearing or a lawyer. The Costa Mesa man, now 33, was forced to represent himself even though he functions at the mental level of a child and cannot tell time or remember his birthday.
That year the lawsuit was expanded to class-action status, and U.S. District Court Judge Dolly M. Gee ruled in the ACLU’s favor Tuesday. According to the ACLU, it applies to certain detainees now held in Arizona, California and Washington.
The new policy includes competency hearings for detainees and a screening process for serious mental disorders.
- Posted April 26, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Detained immigrants with mental disorders get counsel
headlines Detroit
- Wayne State University Law School to honor four distinguished alumni and faculty member at 2026 Alumni Wall of Fame ceremony
- Supreme Court aims to increase access for people who cannot afford a lawyer
- Voters had a big win at the Supreme Court this week. What does it all mean?
- Daily Briefs
- Five Michigan Law 3Ls selected for Dow Sustainability Fellowship Program
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




