WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court won’t hear an appeal from a company that wants to offer flight-sharing services using a model similar to Uber.
The justices on Monday left in place a lower court ruling that said Boston-based Flytenow could not operate a website that connected private pilots with passengers willing to share fuel costs and other flight expenses.
The Federal Aviation Administration shut down the website in 2015 after finding that the service violated flight regulations.
Cost-sharing arrangements have long been allowed through word of mouth, bulletin boards and email. But the FAA said using a website was like advertising and subjected those pilots to the same elaborate safety regulations as commercial airlines.
Flytenow argued that it was applying modern technology to a practice that has been around for decades.
- Posted January 10, 2017
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
High court rejects challenge over flight-sharing services
headlines Macomb
- Former public defender moves on to private sector
- Governor signs legislation reforming Michigan’s juvenile justice system
- Michigan voters start casting cast ballot in person at early voting sites
- Chinese National pleads guilty in $80,000 fraud scheme targeting Macomb senior
- Macomb County board of commissioners adopts resolution authorizing intervention in DTE Electric Co. rate increases
headlines National
- How to use AI but steer clear of hallucinated cases
- Lawyers for low-income clients strike in NYC
- Top prosecutor for International Criminal Court accused of sexual misconduct
- Big Tech companies facing new wave of lawsuits over copyright and AI
- Lawyer says he was ‘manic’ when he bought Cape Cod mansion in danger of falling into ocean
- Judge regrets ‘entitled little snot’ comment but still fit for the bench, lawyer says
