OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from an Oklahoma death row inmate who argued that a racist juror tainted the outcome of his trial.
The high court on Monday declined without comment to hear Julius Jones’ case, The Oklahoman reported.
Jones, who is black, was convicted of first-degree murder in the 1999 shooting death of Paul Howell, a 45-year-old Edmond man who was white. Jones argued that his case should be reviewed because a juror referred to him by a racial epithet.
“Obviously, we are disappointed by the decision,” said Dale Baich, a public defender in Arizona who represented Jones. “The systemic racial bias and the racist slur by a juror in this case led to a wrongful conviction. We will continue to investigate this and other issues as well.”
Jones sought the appeal after Victoria Armstrong, a juror in the 2002 trial, told Jones’ lawyers in 2017 that another juror commented that the trial proceedings were “a waste of time.” Armstrong said the juror used a racist slur to describe Jones and said authorities should “shoot him behind the jail.”
The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals rejected his appeal last year, saying similar claims had been reviewed and rejected.
The U.S. Supreme Court in January rejected another appeal Jones filed that argued that people of color are more likely to be sentenced to death in Oklahoma when the victim is white.
Jones has now exhausted his appeals and could receive an execution date once the state resumes executions.
Oklahoma last executed an inmate in 2015. It put the process on hold after abandoning lethal injections to explore the use of nitrogen gas for executions.
- Posted April 03, 2019
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
High court rejects Oklahoma death row inmate's appeal
headlines Detroit
- Department of Corrections disagrees with discrimination charge filed by Civil Rights
- Law firm releases list of the ‘Top 20 Most Dangerous Intersections in Michigan’ for 2025
- ABA amicus brief addresses confidentiality and privilege concerns in border searches of attorneys’ electronic devices
- Here’s what I’ve learned about how medical schools can improve community health
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




