BIG RAPIDS (AP) — A western Michigan prosecutor said in court recently that a “lawless nation” would result if people obeyed pamphlets being distributed outside a courthouse telling them to follow their conscience if selected for a jury.
Mecosta County Prosecutor Brian Thiede argued at a hearing last Thursday the pamphlets distributed by Keith Wood misrepresent the law.
Thiede added that Wood’s direction is based on a disputed legal notion called jury nullification that can lead to disregarding judge’s instructions, The Grand Rapids Press reported.
“There are some consciences out there that I don’t want voting that way,” Thiede said, adding that someone could use jury nullification to exonerate someone responsible for a deadly attack at a Planned Parenthood clinic. “We would have a lawless nation.”
Wood was arrested last month for jury tampering — under orders, he says, from District Judge Peter Jaklevic. Defense attorney David Kallman cites First Amendment protections.
“My client is handing out a pamphlet saying vote your conscience and Mr. Thiede is trying to criminalize it,” Kallman said.
Thiede countered that Wood sought to tamper with a particular jury.
The prosecutor said Wood knew a land use case against an Amish man was set for jury selection the day he distributed fliers.
Kallman said Thiede was working with Jaklevic and the prosecutor should be a witness — leading to the appointment of a special prosecutor by the state attorney general.
Circuit Judge Kimberly Booher said she’ll decide whether Thiede should testify.
- Posted December 15, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Judge to decide if prosecutor will testify
headlines Macomb
headlines National
- How Casetext utilized the latest GPT technology to create an AI legal assistant
- Trump motion seeks to block evidence from Georgia special purpose grand jury, disqualify district attorney
- The Law Firm Disrupted: An Overcapacity Postmortem of Cooley
- Citing 'Extravagant Measures' to Avoid Paying Judgment, Court Orders Defendants to Provide Monthly Financial Records to Plaintiff
- Justices appear sympathetic to Jack Daniel’s in trademark parody dispute
- Court to decide how specific a patent disclosure must be