––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted September 09, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Magistrate judge says suit over Chevron stock should be dismissed
DETROIT (AP) -- A Detroit-area man who is suing to get valuable stock in oil giant Chevron is hitting a dry well.
A judge is recommending that Perry Christy's lawsuit be dismissed. The Northville man wants to invest $100,000 in Chevron stock -- at 2004 prices.
Christy insists he invested that amount seven years ago but the money was never taken out of his checking account. There is no dispute that the former lawyer went online and created a Chevron stock account.
Chevron and Mellon Investor Services say Christy simply is trying to benefit from the rise in the company's stock price. A $100,000 investment in 2004 would be worth more than $250,000 today with dividends reinvested.
Federal Magistrate Judge Laurie Michelson is recommending to another judge that the case be dismissed.
Published: Fri, Sep 9, 2011
headlines Oakland County
- New lawyers join the bar
- McDonald, Nessel seek to block parole of convicted murderer
- Oakland County Clerk/Register Brown brings services to Highland Township and surrounding areas with June 2 local office visit
- Federal appeals court dismisses Right to Life lawsuit
- Attorney arraigned, allegedly accepted a retainer while law license suspended
headlines National
- Play-Based Learning: Can simulation games help lawyers learn management and business development skills?
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Court orders hospital to resume gender-affirming care for transgender kids
- Netflix’s ‘The Lincoln Lawyer’ will rest his case at end of season 5
- Woman gives birth during arraignment in NYC courtroom
- SCOTUS will examine scope of Title IX protections and whether civil rights law covers work bias claims




