- Posted June 15, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Lawsuit that threatened Detroit finances tossed
By Ed White
Associated Press
MASON, Mich. (AP) -- A lawsuit that threatened a delicate financial deal between debt-ridden Detroit and the state of Michigan was thrown out Wednesday after a lawyer for Mayor Dave Bing intervened and said the city's top attorney had no authority to challenge the agreement.
The decision by an Ingham County judge was the latest turn in a strange dispute involving Detroit's elected leaders and the head of the city's law office, Krystal Crittendon, who said she could act independently and didn't have to obey Bing's plea to ax the lawsuit.
Michael Hodge, a lawyer in private practice, asked Judge William Collette to dismiss the case on behalf of the mayor's office.
The judge said he'd never seen a case "where the corporation counsel acts outside the mayor's authority. ... This is such an obvious issue."
"Dave Bing is the mayor," Collette said.
Gov. Rick Snyder and the city agreed earlier this year to stricter oversight of Detroit's finances to avoid the appointment of an emergency manager who would have sweeping powers. Detroit has a newly hired chief financial officer and soon will have a nine-member board to keep an eye on spending. New labor agreements must be in place by mid-July.
Crittendon filed a lawsuit 90 miles away from Detroit in Ingham County, the home of state government, claiming the city can't enter into a deal with the state to fix its finances because the state owes Detroit $220 million in past revenue sharing and other money from overdue water bills and parking tickets.
State officials denied the allegations and had warned Detroit that the lawsuit would jeopardize millions of dollars in current state aid held in escrow if it wasn't dropped. Bing said this week that "without that, we're dead."
Ahead of the court hearing, bond rating agencies downgraded Detroit because of the lawsuit.
"There is a fiscal emergency in the city," Hodge told the judge.
Detroit's budget deficit is more than $200 million, and long-term structural debt is pegged at just over $13 billion. Hundreds of city workers face layoffs, while some city services likely will be cut back.
Bing and Snyder hailed the judge's decision to dismiss the case.
Collette's ruling "means that my administration can get back to dealing with the important issues facing our city," Bing told reporters in Detroit on Wednesday. "This legal challenge has been an unfortunate distraction, but now it's time for the city to move forward."
Bing said he spoke Wednesday with state officials about releasing the revenue sharing that will help the city pay short-term bills, including payroll. He was concerned city workers might not get paid after this week without those funds.
Snyder's office said in a statement that the governor is "gratified" by Collette's decision and that it "allows state and city to continue working together collaboratively to help address the fiscal challenges and crisis in Detroit."
Stabilizing the city's finances will give Detroit residents city services they deserve, added state Treasurer Andy Dillon.
"Continued delays in moving this process forward only promise to make eventual solutions more difficult," Dillon said.
Crittendon did not appear in court Wednesday and sent another lawyer, James Noseda. He told the judge that Crittendon's allegiance belonged to Detroit's newly revised charter, or constitution, which makes the law department an autonomous agency.
Noseda said the law department was "shut out entirely" in the negotiations between the city and state that led to the unprecedented April agreement. He said Crittendon's actions may be unpopular but were necessary.
An appeal of Collette's order is possible, although some city council members said they hope the case is over.
----------------
Associated Press writer Corey Williams in Detroit contributed to this report.
Published: Fri, Jun 15, 2012
headlines Oakland County
- Law school hosts Moot Court Winter 2026 In-House Competition
- Man pleads no contest to false report or threat of terrorism, aggravated stalking and habitual offender fourth
- ABA Formal Opinion 522 provides guidance on a lawyer’s duty to disclose grounds for judicial disqualification
- Webinar looks into ‘Building Stronger Traffic Data’
- District court discourse
headlines National
- Judge grants stay in February 2025 California bar examinees’ case against ProctorU
- Blake Lively’s sexual harassment claims against Justin Baldoni face legal setback
- TikTok creator sued by immigration firm, accused of making defamatory comments online
- 15 attorney killings remain unsolved, Baja California Bar Association says
- ABA amicus brief supports law firms targeted by executive orders
- Legal services provider 8am and NFL’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers announce partnership




