- Posted July 24, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court of Appeals rejects challenge to clean air rule

By Pete Yost
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal appeals court has rejected a challenge to a tough new clean air requirement limiting sulfur dioxide emissions.
The Environmental Protection Agency regulation is designed to prevent people with asthma from exposure to short-term bursts of sulfur dioxide. Several corporations and industrial associations along with several states argued the new level is lower than required by law to protect public health.
In a 3-0 decision, the court said the Clean Air Act gives EPA significant discretion to revise air quality standards and that the EPA did not act arbitrarily. The court said it cannot conclude that the new standard is unreasonable or unsupported by the record in the case.
The opinion was by Judge David Sentelle, joined by Judges Brett Kavanaugh and Douglas Ginsburg, all appointed by Republican presidents.
Published: Tue, Jul 24, 2012
headlines Oakland County
- Senators accepting applications from candidates interested in nomination for federal judgeship, U.S. attorney, and U.S. marshal in Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan
- Elizabeth Lake Pump Station rehabilitation project underway
- Virtual gathering looks at ‘Barrier Free Design for Planners’
- Bloomfield Township Department of Public Works earns award
- Judicial investiture
headlines National
- Summit offered research-based roadmap for law firms seeking to implement generative AI
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice agrees to license suspension for alleged election-review misconduct
- ‘Stay out of my shorts,’ other discourteous comments led to censure for New York judge
- Federal judge’s Columbia clerk boycott didn’t harm public confidence in judiciary, judicial council rules
- ‘There is no question that we will fight,’ says latest law firm targeted in Trump executive order