- Posted September 04, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
New case at Supreme Court aims to blunt class actions
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court will consider an insurance company's plea to move a class-action lawsuit from state court to a more business-friendly federal court.
The justices last Friday agreed to hear an appeal from The Standard Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford, Conn. The case involves the reach of a 2005 federal law that allows defendants in class-action lawsuits to transfer disputes involving more than $5 million to a federal court from state courts that often favor plaintiffs.
Standard Fire is being sued in Arkansas by a homeowner who complained the company did not pay enough to repair hail damage.
A federal appeals court ruled that the suit could remain in state court because the homeowner has promised in writing to seek less than $5 million for himself and other Arkansas homeowners insured by Standard Fire.
The issue for the justices if whether the promise made by homeowner Greg Knowles, who lives in Miller County in southwestern Arkansas, is binding on others who may eventually be part of the lawsuit.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation's largest business group, sided with the insurance company in urging the court to take the case because it is "of exceptional importance" to the business community.
The chamber said plaintiffs and their lawyers easily could avoid federal courts and the greater protection they afford defendants in class-action lawsuits by promising to limit the amount of money at stake.
Knowles put forward several reasons for turning down the appeal, including that the state court has yet even to certify that Knowles can represent similarly situated Standard Fire policy holders.
The case probably will be argued after Thanksgiving.
The justices rarely decide in the middle of the summer to add new cases for the term that begins in October. But they were short of cases to fill their December argument calendar, and if they waited until their next scheduled conference in late September, there would not be enough time to file legal briefs before the early December argument dates.
Published: Tue, Sep 4, 2012
headlines Oakland County
- District court discourse
- Law school hosts Moot Court Winter 2026 In-House Competition
- Man pleads no contest to false report or threat of terrorism, aggravated stalking and habitual offender fourth
- ABA Formal Opinion 522 provides guidance on a lawyer’s duty to disclose grounds for judicial disqualification
- Webinar looks into ‘Building Stronger Traffic Data’
headlines National
- Judge grants stay in February 2025 California bar examinees’ case against ProctorU
- Blake Lively’s sexual harassment claims against Justin Baldoni face legal setback
- TikTok creator sued by immigration firm, accused of making defamatory comments online
- 15 attorney killings remain unsolved, Baja California Bar Association says
- ABA amicus brief supports law firms targeted by executive orders
- Legal services provider 8am and NFL’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers announce partnership




