- Posted March 26, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Federal judge dismisses birth control lawsuit
By Andrew Welsh-Huggins
AP Legal Affairs Writer
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) -- The government is sufficiently addressing the concerns of an Ohio Roman Catholic university and dioceses in Michigan over a provision of the federal health care law mandating employer-provided birth control, a federal judge ruled last Friday in dismissing their lawsuit.
Franciscan University of Steubenville and an association of Michigan Roman Catholic dioceses sued last year, saying the mandate violates religious freedom by requiring a Catholic entity to comply with the rule.
That portion of the federal health care law came under fire from religious groups that object to the use of contraceptives, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs. In response to the criticism, the Obama administration has been trying to soften the mandate to accommodate religious groups, such as shifting the requirement from the employers to health insurers themselves.
The Justice Department told the court the school and dioceses are protected from the mandate's requirements until at least 2014. It also said the lawsuit wasn't timely because changes were already being made to the regulations to meet the groups' concerns.
U.S. District Judge Algenon Marbley sided with the government, saying the groups couldn't prove they would ever likely suffer the harm they allege. He noted that 15 other federal courts have already ruled similar lawsuits weren't timely and most of those 15 decisions determined the groups filing the lawsuits lacked jurisdiction.
The judge also criticized Franciscan University over its decision in May to drop its student health insurance program out of fear of one day having to provide coverage for contraception.
Marble said the university can't argue harm based on "a phantom specter" created by its own fears, which the government has stated are unsubstantiated, Marbley said.
"It is gravely unfortunate that Franciscan's students have lost the opportunity to receive health insurance coverage from the University," the judge said.
"To the extent Franciscan claims its decision to discontinue providing student insurance is a hardship to itself, however, the hardship is self-inflicted," Marbley continued.
The Justice Department and an attorney for the Michigan dioceses both declined comment.
Franciscan University promised to refile the lawsuit at the appropriate time. Father Terence Henry, the university's president, said the university is still being harmed because, while its current health insurance plan is protected by a "grandfathered" status, any changes in the plan could trigger forced acceptance of the mandate.
"We will not stop fighting this unjust mandate, and we are in this for the long haul," Henry said in a statement. "We are very confident in the merits of our case, and we will continue to do everything in our power to protect our constitutional right to religious freedom."
Published: Tue, Mar 26, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Annual Dinner & Meeting
- FORCE Team arrests six in prolific auto theft ring
- Michigan allocates $12 million to support community-based organizations in advancing environmental and climate justice
- Oakland County and SMART launch pilot program providing free transit for veterans and dependents
- Supreme Court sides with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
headlines National
- More lawyers—and clients—want to learn about sustainable development practices
- Top artificial intelligence insurance tips for lawyers
- Lawyer charged with illegally transmitting Michigan data after 2020 election
- Viral video shows former Rikers Island inmate as she learns she passed bar exam on first try
- How Sullivan & Cromwell is scrutinizing potential new hires after campus protests
- No separate hearing required when police seize cars loaned to drivers accused of drug crimes, SCOTUS rules