- Posted May 27, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
High court says insurer doesn't have to buy van
LANSING (AP) -- An insurance company that refused to pay for a van for a disabled man has won an appeal at the Michigan Supreme Court.
Auto-Owners Insurance says it agreed to pay for modifications to the van so Ken Admire could travel with his wheelchair. But it told the Ingham County man in 2007 that it would no longer pay for an entire vehicle because of a change in Michigan law.
That left Admire with an out-of-pocket cost of $18,000. He was severely injured years ago when his motorcycle was struck by a car.
In a 4-1 decision, the Supreme Court says the cost of a van is an expense that Admire would have faced regardless of his injuries. Republican justices say the need for transportation didn't change because of his accident.
Published: Mon, May 27, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Investiture ceremony
- Contractor agrees to pay one of the largest AbilityOne Program related false claims act settlements
- Nessel protects social services under attack from five agencies
- Association hosts Membership Mixer in Detroit
- Supreme Court won't intervene in custody dispute between couple and surrogate
headlines National
- Education Department committee declines to make recommendation on ABA Legal Ed council status as accreditor
- Plastic surgeon found guilty of murdering ‘beloved’ lawyer
- Salt-N-Pepa ask appeals court to reinstate copyright ownership case
- Are drag shows protected by First Amendment? 5th Circuit weighs in
- SCOTUSblog founder Tom Goldstein will remain in prison as appeal continues
- Scammer who tortured cats hit with state’s harshest animal abuse penalty
