––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted August 28, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Cooley Law professors file amicus brief in Michigan Marriage Equality case
Eight Thomas M. Cooley Law School professors recently filed a joint amicus brief in the marriage equality case DeBoer v. Snyder, which challenges the legality of both the 2004 constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage in Michigan and the Michigan Adoption Code.
"This amendment not only bans same-sex marriage, it also harms the families of same-sex couples, depriving them of the protections of Michigan law," said Dan Ray, professor of constitutional law at Cooley and one of the amicus brief authors. "Same sex couples don't enjoy many of the things that other Michigan couples take for granted, like health care benefits or other spousal benefits. At its core, the amendment is discriminatory and does not reflect the kinds of values the people of Michigan put in our constitution."
The plaintiffs, April DeBoer and Jayne Rowse, are in a long-term, committed relationship, and would marry if they were allowed to by Michigan law. The couple originally filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to challenge the Michigan Adoption Code, which prevents them from jointly adopting the three children they have adopted separately.
Michigan adoption law allows married couples and individuals to adopt, but non-married couples cannot jointly adopt a child. Since same-sex couples cannot legally marry in Michigan, they cannot legally adopt together. Recognizing this, federal Judge Bernard Friedman allowed the plaintiffs to amend their suit to include a challenge to Michigan's same-sex marriage ban.
"The United States Supreme Court has ruled several times, most recently this past June, that discrimination against gays and lesbians just because of their sexual orientation is unconstitutional," said Ray. "The amendment does just that - it singles out gays and lesbians because of their sexual orientation - and refuses to recognize their committed relationships for any purpose. Michigan punishes an entire class of people who have done nothing wrong. The United States Constitution doesn't allow Michigan to do that."
Besides Ray other co-authors of the brief include Cooley Professors Brendan Beery, Alan Gershel, Gina Torielli, Frank Aiello, Emily Horvath, Karen Chadwick and Marjorie Gell.
Oral arguments in the case are scheduled in front of Friedman on Oct. 1.
Published: Wed, Aug 28, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Holiday Gala
- Jury finds Pontiac woman guilty of felony animal neglect following rescue of 37 animals
- Court of Appeals orders resentencing for 18-year-old in second degree murder case
- Local Gems Sweepstakes spotlights hundreds of Oakland County small businesses
- Nessel secures settlements with Menards, Hyundai and Kia, provides updates on Google settlement
headlines National
- Former judge sentenced to 12 years in prison for using public funds for vacations, personal purchases
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Attorney sentenced to 25 years in prison after taking client money for gambling
- Ex-DLA Piper partner accused of assault by former associate
- Legal leaders shoulder more stress, new survey shows
- Some noncitizens may have Second Amendment rights, federal appeals court says




