- Posted August 30, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Community approves non-discrimination ordinance
OSHTEMO TOWNSHIP, Mich. (AP) -- Another southwestern Michigan community has approved an ordinance that would ban discrimination in employment, public accommodation and housing practices.
The measure passed on a 6-1 vote Tuesday night by trustees in Kalamazoo County's Oshtemo Township, MLive.com reported. It closely models one approved last month in Kalamazoo Township.
The ordinance bans discrimination based on several factors, including race, sex, age, religion, national origin, height, weight, marital status, familial status, citizenship, physical or mental ability, gender identity, sexual orientation or genetic information.
Numerous other Michigan communities offer similar protections.
"Oshtemo is a fairly diverse community ... but are you an inclusive community?" resident Jonathan Richardson asked the board before the vote. "I am a Christian, I'm black, I'm part of an interracial couple, I'm gay and I live in Oshtemo, and I bring all of that to my life every day. So I am in favor of your consideration and a positive vote on this ordinance."
Trustee Dave Bushouse cast the lone dissenting vote. Bushouse said he questions whether the township has the authority to adopt the law.
"My basic concern is, as a township, we normally do not get into this issue," Bushouse said. "I seriously question that we have the legal right to get into this issue."
A violation of the ordinance could bring a fine, from $75 to $500.
Published: Fri, Aug 30, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- Appreciating members
- Oakland County purchasing renewable energy to power buildings
- Former Customs and Border Protection agent sentenced to 60 months in prison for receiving child pornography
- Whitmer signs bipartisan bills to expand mental health care, protect consumer data, and increase government efficiency
- Challenge to Michigan’s hen enclosure law dismissed
headlines National
- Protecting Attorney-Client Relationships: ABA advocacy helps safeguard the right to effective assistance of counsel
- Did ‘corporate speak’ and PowerPoint lead to complacency at GM?
- Ex-employee sues Sheppard Mullin over cyberattack exposing sensitive personal data
- Ropes & Gray allows more attorneys to count AI testing toward billable hours
- Plaintiff who filed fraudulent case, trashed desktop computer hit with sanctions
- Man who threatened Supreme Court justices avoids prison time




