- Posted June 20, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Convict wins dispute over financing courthouse
LANSING (AP) - The Michigan Supreme Court says criminal defendants can't be billed for the costs of running the local courthouse.
The court unanimously ruled Wednesday in favor of an Allegan County convict who challenged a $1,000 penalty that accompanied his guilty plea in a drug case. The amount included $500 as his share of the court's operating costs.
The Supreme Court says judges can't order costs that aren't authorized by the Legislature. It overturned an appeals court decision that had upheld the practice used by Allegan and other counties.
Fred Cunningham's attorney is Anne Yantus, and she says the new ruling should greatly reduce the financial burdens on convicts who often have no ability to pay.
The Allegan County court collected $195,000 in 2013.
Published: Fri, Jun 20, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Attorneys sharpen courtroom skills at inaugural program
- Michigan tax preparers indicted for conspiring to defraud the United States and preparing false tax returns
- Woman pleads no contest on multiple cases, including embezzlement of $90K from her father
- As the country turns 250, retired judges hit the road to defend judicial independence
- Private mobile home water services provider, president sentenced for falsifying water safety, discharge tests
headlines National
- ABA connects death row inmate to pro bono attorneys who help free him
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- 2 judges suspended in separate cases after being indicted on criminal charges
- Convicted ex-judge gets $5K fine but no prison time in immigration case
- Ohio governor signs bill prohibiting foreign litigation funding
- Many small firms collect payments faster than BigLaw counterparts, new data shows




