- Posted September 15, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Judge says city isn't on hook for property values
TRAVERSE CITY (AP) - A judge has ruled that Traverse City isn't responsible for declines in property values that could be linked to officials' decision to remove a northern Michigan dam.
The Traverse City Record-Eagle reports Circuit Court Judge Philip Rodgers last Thursday effectively dismissed parts of a lawsuit filed by several Boardman River property owners after an October 2012 breach of the Brown Bridge Dam.
The property owners argued Traverse City should be liable for damaging floods and erosion after the dam's removal. Rodgers disagreed.
Attorney Kristyn Houle, who represents several property owners in the lawsuit, says she "respectfully and strongly disagreed" with Rodgers' decision. She says even without the breach, property owners still suffered from the decision to remove the dam.
The city-owned dam was built for hydropower generation in 1921.
Published: Mon, Sep 15, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Revered: Five jurists get their due at ceremony
- Michigan home health care agency owner convicted of $1.6M medicare fraud scheme and kickback conspiracy
- ABA President Michelle A. Behnke discusses election integrity on 100th episode of Litigation Radio Podcast
- Podcast explores the role of storytelling in the legal profession
- Bloomfield Township Senior Services celebrates National Fitness Month
headlines National
- California joins other states in restricting cat declawing
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- ABA Journal earns honorable mention as Magazine of the Year from business publication editors
- Judge’s ‘disparaging’ courtroom remarks publicly reproved by disciplinary commission
- BigLaw firm commits nearly $1M to summer associates, nonprofits in new program
- Trump lawyer picked for appeals court advances to Senate floor




