- Posted September 15, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Judge says city isn't on hook for property values
TRAVERSE CITY (AP) - A judge has ruled that Traverse City isn't responsible for declines in property values that could be linked to officials' decision to remove a northern Michigan dam.
The Traverse City Record-Eagle reports Circuit Court Judge Philip Rodgers last Thursday effectively dismissed parts of a lawsuit filed by several Boardman River property owners after an October 2012 breach of the Brown Bridge Dam.
The property owners argued Traverse City should be liable for damaging floods and erosion after the dam's removal. Rodgers disagreed.
Attorney Kristyn Houle, who represents several property owners in the lawsuit, says she "respectfully and strongly disagreed" with Rodgers' decision. She says even without the breach, property owners still suffered from the decision to remove the dam.
The city-owned dam was built for hydropower generation in 1921.
Published: Mon, Sep 15, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Holiday Gala
- Nessel highlights latest holiday Consumer Protection campaign alerts
- Bloomfield Township Fire Department Charities presents ‘Fill The Boot’ proceeds to Muscular Dystrophy Association
- Measles case confirmed in Oakland County
- States sue administration again over billions in withheld electric vehicle charging funds
headlines National
- Why state bars are struggling to keep pace with AI in legal practice
- The legal tech stories that defined 2025
- Federal budgets would further hit access to disability lawyers, advocates say
- ABA task force assesses AI’s ‘opportunities and challenges’ in new report
- Attorney discovers secret ‘watch list’ for immigration lawyers
- Lawyer and animal activist creates pet memorial for the holidays




