- Posted April 23, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Mich. Supreme Court rules that some hospital records can't be disclosed

SAGINAW (AP) - The Michigan Supreme Court has unanimously ruled in favor of a hospital in a dispute over access to records in a malpractice lawsuit.
The court says lawmakers have shielded so-called peer review records from disclosure. Peer review committees at hospitals review certain practices as a way to improve patient care.
In a 6-0 decision, the court ruled in a case from Saginaw County. A judge had said lawyers could see "objective facts" listed on the first page of a report about the death of a patient, Dorothy Krusac.
But the Supreme Court says Judge Fred Borchard relied on an erroneous 2014 decision by the Michigan appeals court in a similar case.
The court says a litigant still can rely on eyewitness testimony and a patient's medical records.
Published: Thu, Apr 23, 2015
headlines Oakland County
- Senators accepting applications from candidates interested in nomination for federal judgeship, U.S. attorney, and U.S. marshal in Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan
- Elizabeth Lake Pump Station rehabilitation project underway
- Virtual gathering looks at ‘Barrier Free Design for Planners’
- Bloomfield Township Department of Public Works earns award
- Judicial investiture
headlines National
- Summit offered research-based roadmap for law firms seeking to implement generative AI
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice agrees to license suspension for alleged election-review misconduct
- ‘Stay out of my shorts,’ other discourteous comments led to censure for New York judge
- Federal judge’s Columbia clerk boycott didn’t harm public confidence in judiciary, judicial council rules
- ‘There is no question that we will fight,’ says latest law firm targeted in Trump executive order