BAD AXE, Mich. (AP) — An anonymous call alleging that a driver could be drunk wasn't enough for police to make a traffic stop in Huron County, the Michigan Supreme Court said Thursday.
The court noted that a county officer followed the woman's car but didn't see any violations before stopping the vehicle. She was charged with drunken driving while with a child and having an open container of alcohol.
The stop violated constitutional protections against search and seizure, the court said in a 5-0 opinion.
In 2016, someone called the sheriff's office to report that a woman yelled at children while outside her vehicle and appeared to be drunk.
"There is no support for the conclusion that 'appearing to be obnoxious' and yelling at one's children creates a reasonable and articulable suspicion that one is intoxicated," Justice Richard Bernstein said. "All we have here is little more than a conclusory allegation of drunk driving, which is insufficient to pass constitutional muster."
Writing separately, Justice Brian Zahra said he agreed with the result mainly because of a sparse, "seemingly incomplete" record of the case in Huron County court.
"I encourage citizens to continue to report their suspicions of drunk or impaired driving, urge police officers to remain vigilant in protecting our state's highways, and implore prosecutors to use all available evidence to ensure that an accurate and complete record is developed," Zahra said.
- Posted April 23, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Woman wins drunken driving case at Michigan Supreme Court
headlines Oakland County
- Appreciating members
- Oakland County purchasing renewable energy to power buildings
- Former Customs and Border Protection agent sentenced to 60 months in prison for receiving child pornography
- Whitmer signs bipartisan bills to expand mental health care, protect consumer data, and increase government efficiency
- Challenge to Michigan’s hen enclosure law dismissed
headlines National
- Protecting Attorney-Client Relationships: ABA advocacy helps safeguard the right to effective assistance of counsel
- Did ‘corporate speak’ and PowerPoint lead to complacency at GM?
- Ex-employee sues Sheppard Mullin over cyberattack exposing sensitive personal data
- Ropes & Gray allows more attorneys to count AI testing toward billable hours
- Plaintiff who filed fraudulent case, trashed desktop computer hit with sanctions
- Man who threatened Supreme Court justices avoids prison time




