By Ed White
Associated Press
DETROIT (AP) — A man wrongly convicted of murder who received $1 million after serving roughly 25 years in prison is entitled to more money, the Michigan Supreme Court said Thursday.
Desmond Ricks has been fighting for an additional $216,000. But the state as well as lower courts said he couldn't collect for the first 4 1/2 years because that period was tied to a parole violation for a previous crime.
Ricks said it was extremely unfair. He argued that his murder conviction, which was ultimately erased, had triggered the parole violation.
The Supreme Court, in a 4-3 opinion, agreed that he's eligible for additional compensation.
"The government's errors caused all of Ricks' imprisonment," Chief Justice Bridget McCormack wrote for the majority.
The law's "text, context, and purpose agree: the Legislature intended to provide compensation for time served under a parole-revoked sentence when the revocation was caused solely by a wrongful conviction," McCormack said.
Michigan law grants $50,000 for each year served in prison because of a wrongful conviction.
"I'm very happy, very ecstatic. It's been a long time coming. You can't stop God's work," Ricks, 55, told The Associated Press.
Ricks was released from prison in 2017. The Innocence Clinic at University of Michigan law school found that bullets removed from a homicide victim in 1992 could not have come from a gun that was seized by Detroit police.
In a dissent, Justice Brian Zahra said he doesn't interpret the compensation law in the same way as the majority.
The Legislature "did not intend to provide compensation for every wrong that resulted from the wrongful imprisonment," said Zahra, who was joined by justices Elizabeth Clement and David Viviano.
- Posted July 09, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Michigan court extends compensation to wrongly convicted man
headlines Oakland County
- District court discourse
- Law school hosts Moot Court Winter 2026 In-House Competition
- Man pleads no contest to false report or threat of terrorism, aggravated stalking and habitual offender fourth
- ABA Formal Opinion 522 provides guidance on a lawyer’s duty to disclose grounds for judicial disqualification
- Webinar looks into ‘Building Stronger Traffic Data’
headlines National
- Judge grants stay in February 2025 California bar examinees’ case against ProctorU
- Blake Lively’s sexual harassment claims against Justin Baldoni face legal setback
- TikTok creator sued by immigration firm, accused of making defamatory comments online
- 15 attorney killings remain unsolved, Baja California Bar Association says
- ABA amicus brief supports law firms targeted by executive orders
- Legal services provider 8am and NFL’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers announce partnership




