- Posted December 21, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
COMMENTARY: Judge grants hippos their legal standing
By Marie E. Matyjaszek
With the holidays approaching, Christmas music is being played just about everywhere you go. Gayla Peevey sang "I want a Hippopotamus for Christmas" back in 1953, and may be happy to learn that the U.S. District Court in Cincinnat afforded drug lord Pablo Escobar's hippos the legal recognition as interested "persons."
The hippos were illegally imported by Escobar in the 1980s and lived on his ranch in Columbia with a host of other animals. When Escobar died a decade later, the four hippos were left on his property due to the difficulty in moving them. Facing no threats, they reproduced at an alarming rate and now number close to 100. They also apparently have no fear of people, and take frequent trips into town (presumably for shopping).
Because of their growth, the hippos pose a threat to the area's biodiversity, as well as to humans. The Columbian government began sterilizing some of the animals, and others are proponents of simply killing them. If you're wondering how the U.S. became involved in a Columbian lawsuit, the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) petitioned the U.S. District Court to award "interested persons" status to the hippos so that American experts could testify in the court case. A federal law allows "anyone who is an 'interested person' in a foreign lawsuit to ask a federal court to permit them to take depositions in the U.S. in support of their case."
Previous attempts to award animals personhood in the U.S. have been denied, but Judge Karen Litkovitz has changed that in granting the ALDF request. Many of the arguments in support of the recognition make sense animals already have various protections under the law and this allows for enforcement of these rights. In addition, businesses have standing in court and they are not biologically "people."
It's unclear what impact, if any, the U.S. ruling will have in a Columbian court. However, this case sets precedent for the future rights of other animals. In the past, similar cases for chimpanzees and elephants were denied. Maybe the judge has a soft spot for hippos like the song says, "only a hippopotamus will do."
--------
The author is an attorney referee at the Washtenaw County Friend of the Court; however, the views expressed in this column are her own. She can be reached by e-mailing her at matyjasz@hotmail.com.
Published: Tue, Dec 21, 2021
headlines Oakland County
- Annual Dinner & Meeting
- FORCE Team arrests six in prolific auto theft ring
- Michigan allocates $12 million to support community-based organizations in advancing environmental and climate justice
- Oakland County and SMART launch pilot program providing free transit for veterans and dependents
- Supreme Court sides with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
headlines National
- More lawyers—and clients—want to learn about sustainable development practices
- Top artificial intelligence insurance tips for lawyers
- Lawyer charged with illegally transmitting Michigan data after 2020 election
- Viral video shows former Rikers Island inmate as she learns she passed bar exam on first try
- How Sullivan & Cromwell is scrutinizing potential new hires after campus protests
- No separate hearing required when police seize cars loaned to drivers accused of drug crimes, SCOTUS rules