BATTLE CREEK (AP) — The American Civil Liberties Union won a decision last Friday at the Michigan Supreme Court in a dispute over jail records related to the detention of a Marine veteran in 2018.
Calhoun County has refused to release records, claiming they can be withheld because the jail was holding a man who was arrested by federal immigration officers.
But the Supreme Court, in a 7-0 decision, said a federal regulation restricting information doesn't trump the terms of Michigan's open records law. The case was sent back to a Calhoun County judge.
The arrest of Jilmar Ramos-Gomez by federal authorities was a major mistake. The U.S. citizen was a lance corporal in the Marines and received awards for service in Afghanistan.
Ramos-Gomez was picked up at the Kent County jail, where he had been lodged in an unrelated matter, and taken to the Calhoun County jail. He was released after three days when questions about his citizenship finally were resolved.
The ACLU is seeking medical records, audio and video from Ramos-Gomez' time at the jail.
- Posted February 07, 2022
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Michigan's top court rules for ACLU in jail records dispute

headlines Oakland County
- Judicial investiture
- Former president of asphalt paving company receives prison sentence for bid rigging
- Patent, trademark, copyright law updates on ABA-IPL spring agenda
- Nessel joins bipartisan coalition of 41 attorneys general seeking better federal-state cooperation to end human trafficking
- Dearborn Heights man to stand trial on sexual assault charges
headlines National
- Summit offered research-based roadmap for law firms seeking to implement generative AI
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice agrees to license suspension for alleged election-review misconduct
- ‘Stay out of my shorts,’ other discourteous comments led to censure for New York judge
- Federal judge’s Columbia clerk boycott didn’t harm public confidence in judiciary, judicial council rules
- ‘There is no question that we will fight,’ says latest law firm targeted in Trump executive order