WYANDOTTE (AP) — The Michigan Court of Appeals reinstated a lawsuit against a railroad, 10 years after a teen listening to music was struck by a train and severely injured in suburban Detroit.
The court said a judge misinterpreted a case from 1899 and made other incorrect conclusions while ruling in favor of Grand Trunk Western Railroad.
Jacob Marion, who was 14 at the time, was struck by a train as he walked down tracks while wearing headphones in Wyandotte in 2012.
The conductor and engineer saw the boy and sounded a horn, but the train's emergency brake wasn't activated in time to avoid the collision, according to the appeals court's summary of the event.
Judge Annette Berry applied a case from the 19th century, in which a deaf person was struck by a railroad hand car, and said train operators tried to alert Jacob but he didn't respond.
But the appeals court, among other things, said tort law has come a long way since 1899. The lawsuit now will return to Wayne County court.
"A reasonable jury could conclude that defendants had Jacob in plain sight and recognized his peril for a period of time sufficient to react so as not to strike him," Judge Elizabeth Gleicher wrote last week.
- Posted March 16, 2022
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court rules against railroad that struck Detroit-area teen
headlines Oakland County
- Young Lawyers Summit
- Court of Appeals affirms privilege waiver for schools in mass casualty events
- Nessel reminds residents of potential punishments for swatting
- Main Street Farmington earns national Great American Main Street Award
- Ex-Michigan coach gets probation for misdemeanors that followed his firing
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill




