On Monday, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of the U.S. Department of Justice in its civil antitrust lawsuit to block book publisher Penguin Random House’s proposed $2.2 billion acquisition of Simon & Schuster. The court found that the effect of the proposed merger would be to substantially lessen competition in the market for the U.S. publishing rights to anticipated top-selling books.
“Today’s decision protects vital competition for books and is a victory for authors, readers, and the free exchange of ideas,” said Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “The proposed merger would have reduced competition, decreased author compensation, diminished the breadth, depth, and diversity of our stories and ideas, and ultimately impoverished our democracy.”
“The decision is also a victory for workers more broadly,” said Kanter. “It reaffirms that the antitrust laws protect competition for the acquisition of goods and services from workers. I would like to thank the talented, hardworking staff of the Antitrust Division for their steadfast efforts to safeguard competition in this important case.”
The court’s decision follows a thirteen-day trial in August this year. In November 2021, the Justice Department sued to stop the merger under Section 7 of the Clayton Act. The district court’s opinion is temporarily under seal to allow the parties to review for confidentiality.
- Posted November 02, 2022
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Justice Dept. obtains permanent injunction blocking Penguin Random House's proposed acquisition of Simon & Schuster
headlines Oakland County
- Young Lawyers Summit
- Law school hosts Michigan attorney general for career-focused student event
- Residents reminded to follow emergency orders, avoid common post-storm scams
- County partners with OCC to highlight role of classroom instruction in registered apprenticeship programs
- Court of Appeals affirms privilege waiver for schools in mass casualty events
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill




