As part of its Litigation Institute webinar series, Dykema will present “Navigating Four Challenges for Corporate Compliance” online Thursday, November 16, beginning at 1 p.m.
Dykema’s Government Investigations and Corporate Compliance team will discuss the new DOJ policies on (1) reporting misconduct during the M&A process and (2) document claw back, (3) the evolving case law eroding the attorney-client privilege, and (4) the pending Supreme Court cases on False Claims Act liability. Having held important leadership positions with DOJ and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices in EDMI, SDNY, and DNJ, Dykema’s panel will examine the government perspective and provide helpful information as to how companies can best position themselves to manage the enforcement surge.
Speaking at the webinar will be Dykema’s Jennifer Beidel, member, Bloomfield Hills; Mark Chutkow, member, Bloomfield Hills; Chantel Febus, member, Washington, D.C.; Jonathan Feld, member, Chicago.
For additional information or to register for the webinar, visit www.dykema.com and click on “news and insights.”
- Posted November 07, 2023
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Corporate compliance challenges explored, November 16
headlines Oakland County
- New lawyers join the bar
- ABA announces eight winners of the 2026 Silver Gavel Awards for Media and the Arts
- Local dentist charged with conducting a criminal enterprise in alleged Medicaid fraud scheme
- Event to support Court Appointed Special Advocates
- Supreme Court rules for Black death row inmate from Mississippi over racial bias in makeup of jury
headlines National
- Play-Based Learning: Can simulation games help lawyers learn management and business development skills?
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Court orders hospital to resume gender-affirming care for transgender kids
- Netflix’s ‘The Lincoln Lawyer’ will rest his case at end of season 5
- Woman gives birth during arraignment in NYC courtroom
- SCOTUS will examine scope of Title IX protections and whether civil rights law covers work bias claims




