The National Center for State Courts will present a webinar on “The Work of the CCJ/COSCA Fines, Fees, and Pretrial Practices 2.0 Task Force” Thursday, December 12, at from noon to 1 p.m. via Zoom.
The 2.0 Task Force builds on the work of a previous Conference of Chief Justices (CCJ) and Conference of State Court Administrators (COSCA) Task Force, established in 2016. Throughout 2024, it produced resources discussing the current landscape of state reforms to legal financial obligations and pretrial practices, developed case studies to highlight innovative and successful approaches, and created educational materials for courts.
This webinar will highlight tools and resources developed by the 2.0 Task Force and feature a conversation between the 2.0 Task Force members and members of the original Task Force.
Speaking at the webinar will be:
• Chief Justice Nathan Hecht, Texas Supreme Court
• Chief Justice Matthew Fader, Maryland Supreme Court
• Gayle Lafferty, state court administrator, Delaware Judicial Branch
• Moderator Laurie Givens, vice-president, Court Consulting Services, National Center for State Courts
To register for the webinar, visit www.ncsc.org and click on “webinars.”
- Posted December 10, 2024
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Webinar examines work of CCJ/COSCA 2.0 Task Force
headlines Oakland County
- Graduation day
- Law school holds winter commencement
- Kenyan anti-FGM law punishes victims more often than perpetrators, new report finds
- New Environmental Justice Impact Grants support community improvement projects addressing environmental justice issues across Michigan
- Nessel warns consumers about holiday payment apps and scams
headlines National
- Class-action lawyer went from being 50 Cent’s roadie to taking on TikTok
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Poll: Which ABA Journal magazine cover from 2024 was your favorite?
- Check out our favorite 2024 photo galleries
- 5th Circuit judge’s remarks spur talk of Supreme Court audition
- Does judge’s reference to ‘little Chinese woman’ show bias? Appellate concurrence sees ‘pure stereotyping’