DETROIT (AP) — A court says no constitutional rights are violated when two Detroit-area men are forced to go through additional security checks at U.S. airports.
Nasser Beydoun and Maan Bazzi lost their appeals Tuesday at a federal appeals court. They say they have missed flights and been humiliated due to extra airport screening.
Beydoun and Bazzi say they get more attention when they fly because they’ve been placed on a government watch list. The government won’t confirm or deny it.
In a 3-0 decision, the appeals court says there’s a constitutional right to fly. But the court says inconvenient security procedures as described by the two men don’t violate the Constitution.
- Posted September 14, 2017
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Men lose challenge over extra airport screening
headlines Oakland County
headlines National
- Federal judge says motion is littered with ‘unnecessary potshots and hyperbole,’ offers chance to refile
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- The 2023 Legalweek Leaders in Tech Law Awards Winners Are Here!
- Citing 6th Circuit's Blessing to 'Filter Out' Complaints, Michigan District Court Amends Local Rules on 'Vexatious' Filings
- Announcement of opinions for Tuesday, March 21
- Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case