DETROIT (AP) — An appeals court has dismissed a lawsuit against a U.S. border agent who was accused of wrongly detaining a young man for hours in a cold cell at a Detroit international bridge.
In a 2-1 decision, the court said last Friday that a key legal precedent that applies to questionable behavior by federal agents doesn’t apply at the border.
Anas Elhady, a U.S. citizen and a Muslim, was detained at the Ambassador Bridge while returning to Michigan from Canada in 2015. He claims he’s on a watch list and gets harassed when he travels.
Elhady said officers took his coat and shoes, leaving him only with his shirt, pants and socks. He said he shivered uncontrollably and was taken to a hospital by ambulance after four hours.
U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith in 2020 said the lawsuit against one officer could go forward based on Elhady’s right to be “free from exposure to severe weather and temperatures.”
But the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said different legal standards for liability apply at the border and Elhady had “no cause of action.”
- Posted November 23, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
U.S. wins appeal over keeping man in cold border cell
headlines Oakland County
- Leadership role
- No legionella detected at the Oakland County jail, courthouse tower and child development center
- Jury convicts man of killing his girlfriend, the mother of his child
- Nessel files motion to reopen ‘Conditional Approval’ of DTE data center contracts
- Distinguished constitutional law scholar honored at ABA reception for lifetime achievement
headlines National
- Inter American University of Puerto Rico School of Law back in compliance with ABA standard
- Chemerinsky: The Fourth Amendment comes back to the Supreme Court
- Reinstatement of retired judge reversed by state supreme court
- Mass tort lawyer suspended for 3 years for lying to clients
- Law firms in Minneapolis are helping lawyers, staff navigate unrest
- Federal judge faces trial on charges of being ‘super drunk’ while driving




