For the first time in the school’s history, Wayne State University Law School’s Moot Court program is among the top 20 Moot Court programs in the nation.
Each year, the Blakely Advocacy Institute at the University of Houston Law Center compiles data on the success of moot court programs for all U.S. law schools. Wayne Law earned the 17th highest point value.
Recent Wayne Law Moot Court successes include:
• Last month, Wayne Law’s team of second-year student Jonathan Demers of Detroit, and third-year students Amy Huang of Farmington Hills and Chris Rambus of Detroit finished as quarterfinalists at the American Bar Association National Appellate Advocacy Competition. Demers was honored as a Top 10 Oral Advocate. The team also took home the National Best Brief Award.
• Second-year students Fawzeih Daher of Dearborn and Jacob Simon of Bloomfield Hills won an Outstanding Brief Award at the Duberstein Bankruptcy Moot Court Competition in March.
• In February, third-year students Elaina Bailey of Taylor and Sarah Cravens of Detroit, and second-year students Nicole Pitchford of Royal Oak, Aaron Shuman of Royal Oak and Adam Winnie of Taylor won the U.S. Midwest Regional of the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition.
- Posted May 30, 2017
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Moot Court program ranked in top 20 of U.S. law schools
headlines Oakland County
- Mental Health Focus
- Detroit Medical Center, Vanguard Health Systems, and Tenet Healthcare Corporation agree to pay over $29 million to settle False Claims Act allegations
- Association of Legal Administrators hosts educational event
- Oakland County woman pleads guilty to tax fraud
- No lawsuit immunity for Michigan official who had rifle during online meeting
headlines National
- Law school clinics tackle challenging issue of heirs’ property rights
- The NextGen bar exam includes an expansion of skills testing, so how will candidates study?
- The Law Firm Disrupted: Hybrid Work Is Going Strong, but Skadden Wants More
- Google Agrees to Pay Washington State $39.9M to Resolve Suit Over Allegedly 'Misleading' Location Tracking Practices
- Justices limit suits challenging misleading securities registration statements
- Supreme Court maintains focus on defendant’s subjective beliefs in False Claims Act cases