- Posted April 18, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Woman buys home for $3,200, gets $115K settlement
KALAMAZOO (AP) -- A woman who bought a 110-year-old home from Kalamazoo for $3,200 has agreed to a $115,000 settlement with the city after she said officials failed to disclose the possibility it contained lead-based paint and blamed the home for her child's elevated lead levels.
Brandi Crawford last year bought the two-story, 1,800-square-foot home, which had gone through tax foreclosure, MLive.com reported. In March, she filed a claim that city officials didn't provide her with an Environmental Protection Agency-approved form warning her of the potential of lead-based paint in the home.
Crawford said the city knew the home contained lead-based paint. Under federal law, the city should have provided a disclosure since the home was built before 1978.
City officials acknowledged that they failed to provide documents but denied knowing that lead-based paint was inside. Kalamazoo City Attorney Clyde Robinson said the city wasn't required to test the property for lead, but it had an obligation to disclose the possibility of lead.
"We did no testing," Robinson said.
The city had acquired the home from the state in 2007. The Kalamazoo City Commission unanimously voted for the settlement Monday.
Published: Thu, Apr 18, 2013
headlines Oakland County
headlines National
- Protecting Attorney-Client Relationships: ABA advocacy helps safeguard the right to effective assistance of counsel
- Did ‘corporate speak’ and PowerPoint lead to complacency at GM?
- Ex-employee sues Sheppard Mullin over cyberattack exposing sensitive personal data
- Ropes & Gray allows more attorneys to count AI testing toward billable hours
- Plaintiff who filed fraudulent case, trashed desktop computer hit with sanctions
- Man who threatened Supreme Court justices avoids prison time




