LANSING (AP) — The Michigan Supreme Court has used a dispute at a women’s shelter to clarify the scope of the state’s whistleblower protection law.
In a decision this week, the court says the law doesn’t protect people who simply believe an illegal act might be in the works.
Barbara Pace claimed she was fired at an agency called SIREN, in Eaton County, because she reported that a co-worker planned to use grant money to buy a stove. Pace says she was
dismissed in violation of Michigan’s whistleblower protections.
But the Supreme Court says the whistleblower law can be triggered when a suspicious act has already occurred or is ongoing. SIREN says it found no evidence of wrongdoing in the alleged
stove scheme.
The case now returns to the appeals court.
- Posted February 04, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court clarifies range of whistleblower law

headlines Oakland County
- Senators accepting applications from candidates interested in nomination for federal judgeship, U.S. attorney, and U.S. marshal in Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan
- Elizabeth Lake Pump Station rehabilitation project underway
- Virtual gathering looks at ‘Barrier Free Design for Planners’
- Bloomfield Township Department of Public Works earns award
- Judicial investiture
headlines National
- Summit offered research-based roadmap for law firms seeking to implement generative AI
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice agrees to license suspension for alleged election-review misconduct
- ‘Stay out of my shorts,’ other discourteous comments led to censure for New York judge
- Federal judge’s Columbia clerk boycott didn’t harm public confidence in judiciary, judicial council rules
- ‘There is no question that we will fight,’ says latest law firm targeted in Trump executive order