LANSING (AP) — The Michigan Supreme Court has used a dispute at a women’s shelter to clarify the scope of the state’s whistleblower protection law.
In a decision this week, the court says the law doesn’t protect people who simply believe an illegal act might be in the works.
Barbara Pace claimed she was fired at an agency called SIREN, in Eaton County, because she reported that a co-worker planned to use grant money to buy a stove. Pace says she was
dismissed in violation of Michigan’s whistleblower protections.
But the Supreme Court says the whistleblower law can be triggered when a suspicious act has already occurred or is ongoing. SIREN says it found no evidence of wrongdoing in the alleged
stove scheme.
The case now returns to the appeals court.
- Posted February 04, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court clarifies range of whistleblower law
headlines Oakland County
- District court discourse
- Law school hosts Moot Court Winter 2026 In-House Competition
- Man pleads no contest to false report or threat of terrorism, aggravated stalking and habitual offender fourth
- ABA Formal Opinion 522 provides guidance on a lawyer’s duty to disclose grounds for judicial disqualification
- Webinar looks into ‘Building Stronger Traffic Data’
headlines National
- Judge grants stay in February 2025 California bar examinees’ case against ProctorU
- Blake Lively’s sexual harassment claims against Justin Baldoni face legal setback
- TikTok creator sued by immigration firm, accused of making defamatory comments online
- 15 attorney killings remain unsolved, Baja California Bar Association says
- ABA amicus brief supports law firms targeted by executive orders
- Legal services provider 8am and NFL’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers announce partnership




